On Less Is More

The President with outgoing secretary C. Bascom Slemp and incoming Everett Sanders, January 19, 1925, outside the Executive Offices.

The President with outgoing secretary C. Bascom Slemp and incoming Everett Sanders, January 19, 1925, outside the Executive Offices. Courtesy of the Library of Congress.

Since the Florida House ended the legislative session three days early last week, those most disappointed opine that a mere 231 bills were passed, the lowest number in seventeen years, on story claims. For those downcast by the lack of more laws, more government activity, more statewide entrenchment of measures that prudence dictates can stand – if not, outright needs – more discussion before another bill is rammed through without a full understanding of its contents or its practical implications, take a look at what Calvin Coolidge had to say about legislating.

In a letter to his father, dated September 6, 1910, shortly after the older man had been elected to the Vermont Senate, Mayor Coolidge writes, “It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones, and better to spend your time on your own committee work than by bothering with any bills of your own except in some measure that your own County or some other persons may want you to introduce for them…See that bills you recommend from your committee are so worded that they will do just what they intend and not a great deal more that is undesirable. Most bills can’t stand that test.”

Or how about this proud achievement from his days of presiding over the Massachusetts Senate, noted in Cal’s Autobiography, “I also wanted to cut down the volume of legislation. In this some progress was made. The Blue Book of Acts and Resolves for 1913 had 1,763 pages, for 1914 it has 1,423, and for 1915 only 1,230, which was a very wholesome reduction of more than thirty per cent. People were coming to see that they must depend on themselves rather than on legislation for success.” Whether due to the exertions of the Florida Speaker, the Budget Committee chairman, or the diligence of all its members, our State House should be commended for moving back toward this sound direction where less is more, where quality instead of quantity is the measure of success on behalf of our people.

As he would also declare in 1914, “Don’t hurry to legislate. Give administration a chance to catch up with legislation…”

After leaving the White House, former President Coolidge would continue to urge the same conscientious approach to the nation in his daily column on March 10, 1931, “A good measure can stand discussion. A bad bill ought to be delayed…Open debate is the only shield against the irretrievable action of a rash majority.”

The ignorant assertions by some newspapers that the system in Florida is broken – since they did not get the implementation of Obamacare – is not unlike what Coolidge faced in 1916, when, in answer to the charge that profits meant the entire economic system was corrupt, he responded, “That is as sound as it would be to abolish writing to prevent forgery. We need to keep forever in mind that guilt is personal; if there is to be punishment let it fall on the evil-doer, let us not condemn the instrument.” Those who should be the most informed, helping to inform the people of Florida, are confusing the issue, blaming a system when any blame must be laid squarely on those who rush hastily considered bills to passage time and time again at the expense of our people. It is convenient how partisanship and influence only become matters of righteous indignation when the other side fails to secure what it wants. What about all the people of our state? Someone has to pay for that expenditure. As Calvin Coolidge noted more than once, “Financial stability is the first requisite of sound government.” If the money is not there, no law will create it. It is through the labor and toil of the people that every tax levied, every appropriation passed, is paid. Out of their substance comes each expenditure.

For Coolidge, as we have noted before, the end of a Congressional session was always a source of relief, most of all, to the rest of the country. Certainly, plenty went home without legislative “goodies,” (then as now) but what service was rendered to the whole people meant far more by a cessation in government action for a time. We have had too much legislative activity, it is time to rejoice for a change when legislators pause. This is no less so for state legislative sessions. Instead of condemning the Florida House for a job well done, they should be praised for this return to an example of good governance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s